Quality

Recently, I have been reading Lila by Robert Pirsig. It's been an interesting read, although comparatively slow because of the philosophical implications of the content. One of the primary ideas that the first 150 pages discuss is that of Quality (yes, with a capital Q). An example that really struck me was how a man can be so sad for seemingly no reason in a good environment, but so happy in a bad environment.

The explanation lay in the classification of Quality into two categories: Dynamic quality and static quality. Dynamic quality is the satisfaction we get from novelty. When we are in any sort of changed location or situation, our mood may improve because of the interest of unfamiliar surroundings. Static quality is something that we have established over time. It is a set of values that lack the luster of Dynamic quality but are still held in high regard by us. The everyday assortment of tasty food and pleasant weather in the spring is a part of static quality--it is not new, and thus does not excite us. In a way, we take it for granted, but it is nonetheless enjoyable.

I guess it's pretty clear how this translates into real life. It determines how we value things, whether we are happy in a certain situation or not. I'd never thought of it this way before, but looking around me at my life right now, I can see it so clearly. If nothing more, this emphasizes the importance of variety to allow for an increase in Dynamic quality in our lives.

My mind is rather removed from what I write right now, although I did find that point to be of significant interest. Alas, I grow tired of that which is around me and look forward to the impending change in surroundings. I know that I will grow tired of that rather quickly as well, but at least it will be a relief for a short period.